As long as we get to kill Unreliable. I BOUGHT HIS COUNTER ON THE VERY LAST DAY OF MY FIRST GAME OF WW EVER AND LOST THE GAME AT LYLO 2v1. Vengeance must be exacted.
More seriously, I'm cool with whoever else we want to vote, as long as there is a semi-decent case like that against Rohan, lol
Problem with the games on SK is like half the people are just voting so we could policy lynch all day and still miss scum hiding in the shadows snickering.
Damdred works for me too, though. I'm no expert, but doesn't he spend most of his town games shooting question after annoying question at anyone and everyone he can get to answer him? lol
I'm thinking a random cold snap. If you're not wearing a jacket, bye bye! Or not wearing a jacket and don't have a bunny hunny. Quick, appeal to the whores...we don't want to die ;o;
On the note of whores and dying...is the AIDs thing retroactive? Like all the wabbits the whore slept with in the past suddenly kick it? Or just from then on? lol
I'm thinking a random cold snap. If you're not wearing a jacket, bye bye! Or not wearing a jacket and don't have a bunny hunny. Quick, appeal to the whores...we don't want to die ;o;
On the note of whores and dying...is the AIDs thing retroactive? Like all the wabbits the whore slept with in the past suddenly kick it? Or just from then on? lol
Pretty sure it's from then on, otherwise that would be really really really over powered. And wouldn't really make sense also cus they didnt have aids at the point they slept with them.
Lol that would be the one that made more sense, yes. But it would also be very funny if half the player base just dropped dead from time-traveling AIDs virus xP
Ah, Mages, you almost had me convinced you were town until you went ahead and put a WW read on me. Now I can't tell if it's just because I've been quiet(which isn't that out of norms for me) or if you're going for who you KNOW is a villager on the off-chance I have a good role again.
I'm as VT as it comes, and although I've played my fair share of games, it still sometimes takes me a bit to catch up to speed and try to get any reads on anyone.
That being said, I do agree with the read on Rohan for now but I won't vote someone for Chief who wants to kill a villager.
I'm VT. I have no idea what you are. With nothing to go on and the town already looking like it's off to a bad start, the last thing I want to do is go on the offensive on someone I'm not even sure is evil. Although you are definitely painting yourself as evil here and now, Mages. I'm just going to defend my innocence and hope no one is stupid enough to waste their time on me.
I didn't even vote SB during that trollynchtrain.
Honestly, mate, the fact that you've looked at all these angles for what I've done means you've ran all these scenarios in your head before. Possibly when you were thinking of them with you in mind?
And no, I don't expect my campaign to pick up. But up until today(end of the weekend), I haven't been paying as much attention as I could be. So blindly voting for a Chief whose alignment I'm unsure of doesn't sit well with me. At least I know I voted for town for Chief today.
And yeah, it is a Freudian slip, somewhat. I'd LOVE to have someone stronger than a villager get lynched because last time I checked, Werewabbits are stronger than villagers.
The difference is, SB's a good WW player and tried to sow discord. I'm just me. Quite frankly, you're doing me a favor if you kill me.
Mages, you're using a past game to try to prove something for this one and it won't float with me. I know you're smart, therefore I know you think this back and forth ploy will work once again in your favor because of how it happened last time. No one here likes to think for themselves so they see "oh, Mages and Shining back and forth. One must be good, one must be bad. Mages made a good point about this being exactly the same thing as last time so he HAS to be good again." Except he's not.
I refuse to believe you're town now, Mages. And if you are, you're playing way worse for town than I've ever seen you play.
And Rohan lol thanks for that. When you die and you eventually get revealed as scum, I need the town to please remember that a baddie would not confirm another baddie on his way out. Rohan knows I'm Town and wants me to die with him.
Hey, if that's how you feel, more power to you. I don't see the purpose in throwing your own alignment into question and subsequently throwing everything you say into question, but...if it works for you...
I think it's very convenient for you to attack people (some with clearly BS arguments) like a savage beast, then as soon as they give a solid response back off and go oh, jk, I was just testing you.
But I prefer systematic to rampant accusations and chaos, so scum flips it is. You try to derail an Unreliable lynch I'll come at you hard. You or him, one of you is a WW and I'm not letting you try to distract from that.
Rohan hasn't tried hard enough to defend himself so I can't see him being seer. He's barely fought back which in my limited experience, is something wolves do. Similar to how Tyrsis kind of gave up. If he was a good role, I would hope he would do a little more to avoid a lynchz
Rohan hasn't tried hard enough to defend himself so I can't see him being seer. He's barely fought back which in my limited experience, is something wolves do. Similar to how Tyrsis kind of gave up. If he was a good role, I would hope he would do a little more to avoid a lynchz
I feel fairly safe in that for today.
I'm a villager, I'd defend myself, but I'm not a major roll, kinda waste of my efforts to write out paragraphs when the wagons spoken :P
It was a tag to a PM post he made in I'm assuming the WW thread, I couldn't read all of the posts, just mages regarding who to kill night one. Mages isn't the alpha I don't think and why he would tag me is beyond me, but it was done never the less.
Comments
As long as we get to kill Unreliable. I BOUGHT HIS COUNTER ON THE VERY LAST DAY OF MY FIRST GAME OF WW EVER AND LOST THE GAME AT LYLO 2v1. Vengeance must be exacted.
More seriously, I'm cool with whoever else we want to vote, as long as there is a semi-decent case like that against Rohan, lol
Problem with the games on SK is like half the people are just voting so we could policy lynch all day and still miss scum hiding in the shadows snickering.
Damdred works for me too, though. I'm no expert, but doesn't he spend most of his town games shooting question after annoying question at anyone and everyone he can get to answer him? lol
There's enough WWs left that I feel we have to strike gold soon, it's starting to become more apparent but more time is needed.
Ofc what does it matter, in walls' games we will all die to NPCs anyway
On the note of whores and dying...is the AIDs thing retroactive? Like all the wabbits the whore slept with in the past suddenly kick it? Or just from then on? lol
I'm as VT as it comes, and although I've played my fair share of games, it still sometimes takes me a bit to catch up to speed and try to get any reads on anyone.
That being said, I do agree with the read on Rohan for now but I won't vote someone for Chief who wants to kill a villager.
!KILL ROHAN
!CHIEF SHINING
I didn't even vote SB during that trollynchtrain.
Honestly, mate, the fact that you've looked at all these angles for what I've done means you've ran all these scenarios in your head before. Possibly when you were thinking of them with you in mind?
And no, I don't expect my campaign to pick up. But up until today(end of the weekend), I haven't been paying as much attention as I could be. So blindly voting for a Chief whose alignment I'm unsure of doesn't sit well with me. At least I know I voted for town for Chief today.
And yeah, it is a Freudian slip, somewhat. I'd LOVE to have someone stronger than a villager get lynched because last time I checked, Werewabbits are stronger than villagers.
Mages accuses Shining of being evil
Rohan accuses Shining of being evil
What
Mages, you're using a past game to try to prove something for this one and it won't float with me. I know you're smart, therefore I know you think this back and forth ploy will work once again in your favor because of how it happened last time. No one here likes to think for themselves so they see "oh, Mages and Shining back and forth. One must be good, one must be bad. Mages made a good point about this being exactly the same thing as last time so he HAS to be good again." Except he's not.
I refuse to believe you're town now, Mages. And if you are, you're playing way worse for town than I've ever seen you play.
And Rohan lol thanks for that. When you die and you eventually get revealed as scum, I need the town to please remember that a baddie would not confirm another baddie on his way out. Rohan knows I'm Town and wants me to die with him.
-shrugs-
But I prefer systematic to rampant accusations and chaos, so scum flips it is. You try to derail an Unreliable lynch I'll come at you hard. You or him, one of you is a WW and I'm not letting you try to distract from that.
[b]!CHIEF ZEALITY[/b]
I feel fairly safe in that for today.
I'm a villager, I'd defend myself, but I'm not a major roll, kinda waste of my efforts to write out paragraphs when the wagons spoken :P
[b]!CHIEF JARJAR[/b]
I changed my mind. You've been in lockstep with Mages too much, Zeal, and I'm beginning to doubt him.