I truly don't understand, Chic-fil-a stated their PERSONAL opinions of what they believe in. They stated that they DO NOT discriminate in their business against ANYONE all they did, was admit to the world what THEY believed in. In other words they expressed their LEGAL beliefs, after all we are FREE citizens in America. And to all the "high ranking" officials in the "big" cities who state they will not accept "intollerant" companies, who is being intolerant? Someone who is simply stating there opinion, or someone saying "I will not allow your company because of your beliefs in our city". So please tell me who is TRULY being intolerant?!?! This whole situation has been blown COMPLETELY out of proportion!!! I truly hope that people see this for what it is, that Chick-Fil-A is simply expressing their rights/beliefs as free American citizens, and are NOT discrimination against anyone as far as their business is concerned
Comments
And I quote, "we are inviting God's wrath by allowing same-sex marriage", dah fuck they putting in their food?
i only know of this because a good hockey player decided to back the company and it gave me lolz
Cathy suggested that the nation could face God's wrath over the redefinition of marriage. I think we are inviting God's judgment on our nation when we shake our fist at him and say, 'We know better than you as to what constitutes a marriage,' Cathy said. 'I pray God's mercy on our generation that has such a prideful, arrogant attitude to think that we would have the audacity to try to redefine what marriage is all about.'"
This is the editors OPINION of what Cathy suggested HAHAHAH the actual quote only says their personal opinion(which they are legally entitled to) and also the part about "we know better" Is very taken out of context .
My post stands, that this issue has no relevence, as in the company SIMPLY STATED theier personal view point on the issue, how does this have any issue with their company and how they operate.
Why did you feel the need to polute this forum that has an outstanding reputation for only discussing intelligent, worthwhile, important debates..... lol
Still id rather Fil-A-Chic
Just sayin
Oh look, the President of the company is using Chick-Fil-A's money to sponsor official anti-equality groups.
I do agree with standing up for what you believe in, but NSG pointed out how the president is using Chick-fil-A money to finance different benefits. Thats kind of meh they are a private company plenty of other companies donate to things.
I say if you enjoy the food eat it, they don't practice unethical hiring policies and they haven't done anything illegal a older than dirt person who expresses their opinion shouldn't hurt my stomach any even if he is wrong
Yea there are worse things in the world. It's a logical fallacy though to let one bad thing off the hook though just because other quantitatively/qualitatively worse things are occurring.
Jesus Christ, why must you turn this into something it is not.
My argument was simply this, they DID NOTHING WRONG OR ILLEGAL who cares what they spend their money on!!!
are you kidding me, if you are going to pull that out, why don't you look into EVERY COMPANY and see what they spend THEIR MONEY ON.
The issue is simply this both sides of the issue take things way to far, they are BOTH ENTITLED to their own views etc.
1. I LOVE Chick-fil-a!!!!!!!
2. It is America the Owner of the company can w/e the fuck he wants...and these gay/lesbian groups can say w/e they fuck they want....
...BUT the city of chicago can not DISCRIMINATE against this company just because they have a belief that is different from them...the beauty of america is that they LEGALLY can not do shit to stop him(this is a difficult pt for most around the world and the idiots here that do NOT understand our constitution)
http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2007/0723/080.html
^ they've been sued 12+ times for employment discrimination, they say stuff like how they prefer to hire people who are married, they fire/don't hire people who are "sinful" or have other jobs/activities they don't agree with, they fired a muslim who wouldn't pray to jesus at company training
http://www.glaad.org/blog/chick-fil-sued-gender-discrimination
they also apparently fired a chick so she could be a "stay at home mom" though i'm sure posting this will invite all kind of sexism from y'alls
i would say the cities probably can't ban them because that's just like one mayor dude making the decision but the uni campuses can stop them from opening places on campus if the students are voting against it (and some of them seem to be) because the students are just voting based on their personal opinions too
personally i wouldn't spend my money there and i'd vote that shit off my campus too but i don't have to because they don't exist in the mad sinful land of canada where we love gays and my gay friends go shopping to find pretty clothes to wear to pride
Fred Phelps chic-fil-a...
It's like saying you disagree with the Hell's Angel's then attacking a guy on a moped.