Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Aggressive Multi List and Raping News

13»

Comments



  • Noob. Flazer is a huge liar. Remember when he tried to convince everybody LTs were better than LDs?

    Point proven.
    [b]LT[/b]
    cost 400: 280
    total cost 550: 430
    nw 7:
    cost per nw 78.5: 61.4
    defense points 4:
    [b]cost per defense point: 137.5: 107.5[/b]
    ---
    [b]LD[/b]
    cost 550: 385
    total cost 700: 535
    nw 8:
    cost per nw 87.5: 66.8
    defense points 5:
    [b]cost per defense point: 140: 107[/b]
    ---

    However, soldiers should be substracted when applying the 0 soldiers remaining strategy as you want to have the best build composition with the remaining soldiers and available platinum.

    LT = 100/70 per defense point
    LD = 110/ 77 per defense point

    So Flazer is right :P
    But... You also have to take into consideration one last thing...

    LT: 1 Rax (75) * (4) Def Pts = 300 Def Pts.
    LD: 1 Rax (75) * (5) Def Pts = 375 Def Pts.

    That's a lot of additional Rax you have to pay for to have the additional LT's to have equal defense as you get larger. I'm not going to go through all the math to figure out what land would be your break even point, but I think you get the picture.
  • if you want to consider that, then lets also consider how big of an idiot you are

    scars * lts = fucking retarded
    scars * lds = even more fucking retarded

    from this analysis, it clearly shows lts make you less retarded, therefore lts are better
  • Lol silly Flazer that makes no sense
Sign In or Register to comment.