Ohhhh by activity you mean Ash's over abundance of PF threads and how easily they went down? 0_o
I was looking forward to a really strong Fenris and a Epic war but the multies destroyed that hope
me too. we will try again in the next 10 years if SK still exist.
~ i was overly excited for a re-union game, 30 players came back at least, but i was told modern day SK is not my cup of tea. learned the hard way on oct28,2014. ~
I have 17 discussion, I counted - most of them questions on what's new: AT, Terra Form, Calcs, Unspoken rules, etc. In game, about 3 on the multi discussions. The rest were Non-SK related.
What are the reasons to disband BC? If you analyse the relative strengths of the alliances, sure there's more power concentrated in BC, but you can't ask them to disband just because they are more active than other alliances.
If the other alliances boosted activity, I believe BC can be defeated. See graph below.
Comments
Activity at 23. LJ ( NW range 100-200K) - same as above.
Activity at 13. Baconcookies (NW range 500-600K, and then 800-900K)
Another spike of activity by LJ is at 9, with NW range of 900 to 1MM.
Thank you Psychonaut. Interesting to see the trend, 10 years after.
Trying to read correlations, at least trying to make sense of what it was I'm looking at.
networths of kingdoms grouped up and plotted on a graph.
make sense now?
I was looking forward to a really strong Fenris and a Epic war but the multies destroyed that hope
we will try again in the next 10 years if SK still exist.
~ i was overly excited for a re-union game, 30 players came back at least, but i was told modern day SK is not my cup of tea. learned the hard way on oct28,2014. ~
I have 17 discussion, I counted - most of them questions on what's new: AT, Terra Form, Calcs, Unspoken rules, etc.
In game, about 3 on the multi discussions.
The rest were Non-SK related.
That makes up for the 10 years I was gone.