the #1 known IP in SK right there

I still say that McDavid is > Hall/Nuge/Yak. Not all #1 picks are equal, and we picked a shitty stretch to tank

be made fun of for not being able to end game, drop from #8NW to like #16

be made fun of for not being able to end game, drop from #8NW to like #16

be made fun of for not being able to end game, drop from #8NW to like #16

be made fun of for not being able to end game, drop from #8NW to like #16

Bean is a good player. Consistently done respectably well on s2 and was kicking it on s1 this round. Clear #1 even before RR. So how can you call someone that trounced s1 competition a scrub?

Bean is a good player. Consistently done respectably well on s2 and was kicking it on s1 this round. Clear #1 even before RR. So how can you call someone that trounced s1 competition a scrub?

Bean is a good player. Consistently done respectably well on s2 and was kicking it on s1 this round. Clear #1 even before RR. So how can you call someone that trounced s1 competition a scrub?

Bean is a good player. Consistently done respectably well on s2 and was kicking it on s1 this round. Clear #1 even before RR. So how can you call someone that trounced s1 competition a scrub?

Since when has final scores been any indication of actual skill in SK? That would insinuate that chumps like Templars 1:3 is actually a good builder to take that #1 or 2 spot.

Last round from what I saw it was quite clear that he didn't take out the server not because people worked together to stop him (really not even a great effort tbh), but because he intentionally chose

I guess I'm confused. You talk about scores not mattering (which I agree with by the way, never have been a score person myself), but then you talk about how special it was to make the #1 (based on sc

Since when has final scores been any indication of actual skill in SK? That would insinuate that chumps like Templars 1:3 is actually a good builder to take that #1 or 2 spot.

Since when has final scores been any indication of actual skill in SK? That would insinuate that chumps like Templars 1:3 is actually a good builder to take that #1 or 2 spot.

Since when has final scores been any indication of actual skill in SK? That would insinuate that chumps like Templars 1:3 is actually a good builder to take that #1 or 2 spot.

#1 during first war, forget the kd name, yeah the ATs hit him down and we all know what happened from there.

And that's the reason I'm in deletion mode. I don't care if I get hit or die. I do care that people who can't get a decent rank without using Multies or RR strats don't get what's coming to them unles

if there were no real tops, why weren't you #1 bro?

Oh shit Terrible, you broke rule #1 I guess. Tanks must stay home or you're evil like hitler lol!