actually if all the uni turned on na they woudl lose probably under good leadership
I dont think NA would need sabos for anyone in the universe and most of the time with these uni wars theirs only 3-5 sectors that are really involved. I hope it happens this round is dragging.
The universe brought this NA situation on itself. Someone should have stepped up way back in the first war to help Umbrella when PB jumped in on them. That was a turning point in the game.
Yeah your right 13.4m combined vs 25m and out of SlingPie's 10.1m I represent 1.15m of that... that would be great! Plus we've had 4 lines posted in AC in 3 days and Im 1/2 of that...
Who would you guys get to lead the Uni vs NA? From what I see most of the good/great leaders/motivators are in NA.
There seems to be a recurring theme of "issues" with NA that are voiced here on the PFs but never in game.
They're talking about the multis like Nabalu Trading High Mountain Safe Cruise and all those KDs that were helping PB kt you and Kenshin via probes/fails/10 land grab finishers. Sadly the thread with the news is gone but the list isn't.
Uni vs NA is boring. We've already won several times. If people are bored, just have two equal sides consisting of all alliances and everyone just obliterate each other. Just a fight to the death.
Nighhawk 89: On my end, [landed in Nightangels], I see someone being landgrab, decent one, fair deal.
And then he retal twice, 3x on the sectors little guys, did not do my math yet (winks on Spock). Maybe bashing or maybe not, I am LadyAshnod, I wrote that rules at least 12 years ago. The SK universe upheld the Anti-Bashing rules, most AL's were there to sit and agree to disagree on my points of the rule and we come up to a conclusion. Landsize, penalty, who to contact, and how to deal with it...etc.
So far, no anti-bashing rules exist, guess common sense is better than actually agreed rule of the universe. That's cool!
So, talking about bashing, bring on the stats, news, etc. Either resolve it without calling bashing until we got proof. I am in NightAngel, and I can also scream " Oh, we got bash, do something!!! " - to whom? Who cares?
Since, there are not Anti-Bashing rules exist, what is your bases to call it a bash?
* i sit here and wait for your news*
* other wise, waiting for cookies * **arf arf, I should save my sector news...who did what**
Uni vs NA is boring. We've already won several times. If people are bored, just have two equal sides consisting of all alliances and everyone just obliterate each other. Just a fight to the death.
My feel on bashing is simple..dont do it...the only times bashing ie hitting some one 1/3 of your land is acceptable is in war on a kt or if they are caught being a multi. Otherwise its unacceptable and to me constitutes severe repercussions or a Kt status.
Comments
Who would you guys get to lead the Uni vs NA? From what I see most of the good/great leaders/motivators are in NA.
There seems to be a recurring theme of "issues" with NA that are voiced here on the PFs but never in game.
And then he retal twice, 3x on the sectors little guys, did not do my math yet (winks on Spock). Maybe bashing or maybe not, I am LadyAshnod, I wrote that rules at least 12 years ago. The SK universe upheld the Anti-Bashing rules, most AL's were there to sit and agree to disagree on my points of the rule and we come up to a conclusion. Landsize, penalty, who to contact, and how to deal with it...etc.
So far, no anti-bashing rules exist, guess common sense is better than actually agreed rule of the universe. That's cool!
So, talking about bashing, bring on the stats, news, etc. Either resolve it without calling bashing until we got proof.
I am in NightAngel, and I can also scream " Oh, we got bash, do something!!! " - to whom? Who cares?
Since, there are not Anti-Bashing rules exist, what is your bases to call it a bash?
* i sit here and wait for your news*
* other wise, waiting for cookies *
**arf arf, I should save my sector news...who did what**
* must be the vodka*
Either way bashing isn't acceptable *shrug*
Nabulu was bashed.
Mackem (1:3)
Delete
Subject: (Blank). Sent on September 29, 17:12:23hey!
im sorry but this dude is boiling my piss! I cant do anyythink about it either!
September 27, 22:16:52 Our brave kingdom lonely (1:8) attacked Mackem (1:3) and conquered 63 planets.
September 27, 22:17:34 Our brave kingdom lonely (1:8) attacked Mackem (1:3) and conquered 45 planets.
September 27, 22:33:01 Our brave kingdom lonely (1:8) attacked Poontang (1:12) and conquered 63 planets
September 28, 19:31:13 Our brave kingdom lonely (1:8) attacked Sad Panda (1:9) and conquered 64 planets.
September 29, 10:39:15 Our brave kingdom lonely (1:8) attacked Oppo (2:20) and conquered 66 planets.
September 29, 10:40:27 Our brave kingdom lonely (1:8) attacked Oppo (2:20) and conquered 62 planets.
he's bashing evey1! including me! regardless he says I was land easy :S